PhD viva

A PhD viva — also called a viva voce, doctoral viva, thesis defense presentation or PhD defense — is the final oral examination for doctoral candidates. It assesses the originality, rigour and clarity of the thesis and the candidate’s ability to defend their work. Its format, terminology, and level of formality vary by country and institution.

This guide explains the purpose, structure and outcomes of the PhD viva. It outlines who attends, how public or private the examination may be and what to expect before, during and after the viva. The text also offers preparation strategies, useful resources and some notable facts from around the world.

Key takeaways

A PhD viva is the final oral examination for doctoral candidates, required to complete the degree.
It may be called a viva voce, doctoral viva, PhD defense, thesis defense presentation or disputation, depending on the country.
The viva tests the originality, coherence and academic value of the thesis and the candidate’s expertise.
The format usually involves internal and external examiners and may be public or private.
Outcomes include passing with no or minor corrections, major revisions, resubmission, award of a lower degree or failure.
Appeals are only allowed under specific conditions such as procedural error or examiner bias.

What is a PhD viva?

A PhD viva, also known as a doctoral viva, viva voce, thesis defense presentation or PhD defense, is the final oral examination for a doctoral candidate. It serves as the formal process through which the candidate defends their research before a panel of academic examiners.

The main purpose of a PhD viva is to:

Confirm that the research meets doctoral standards
Evaluate the candidate’s understanding of their field
Test the originality and significance of the findings
Assess the clarity and coherence of the arguments

During the viva voce, the examiners ask in-depth questions about the thesis. They focus on the research methods, theoretical framework, and contribution to knowledge. The candidate must justify their choices and demonstrate subject expertise.

In most cases, the PhD viva lasts one to three hours. It usually takes place in private, although in some countries the doctoral defense is a public event. After the viva, the panel decides whether to award the doctorate, request revisions, or, in rare cases, reject the thesis.

Other names

Other names for a PhD viva vary by region and academic tradition. Although they describe the same core process, universities may use different terms to refer to the final oral examination. Common alternatives include:

Doctoral viva: used interchangeably with PhD viva in the UK and Ireland
Viva voce: Latin for ‘with the living voice’; widely used in the UK and Commonwealth countries
Thesis defense presentation: common in the United States and other countries where candidates present their research publicly
PhD defense: the standard term in the US and many European countries
Oral examination: a formal, generic term used in official university documentation
Disputation: used in Nordic countries such as Sweden and Finland, where the defense may take the form of a public academic debate

Despite the variation in terminology, all of these refer to the same academic milestone: the oral defence of a doctoral thesis before a panel of experts.

Is PhD viva the same as PhD defense?

Yes, a PhD viva and a PhD defense refer to the same process, though the terminology differs by region.

In the UK, Ireland and some Commonwealth countries, PhD viva, viva voce or doctoral viva are standard terms. In the United States and parts of Europe, PhD defense or thesis defense presentation is more common.

Both terms describe the final oral examination where the candidate:

Presents and justifies their doctoral research
Answers questions from academic examiners
Demonstrates mastery of their field
Defends the originality and significance of their thesis

Regardless of the name, the PhD viva or defense is a key requirement for earning a doctoral degree.

Purpose

The purpose of a PhD viva is to assess whether the candidate meets the requirements for a doctoral degree. Also known as a PhD defense, thesis defense presentation or viva voce, this oral examination allows academic examiners to evaluate the quality and rigour of the research.

Key objectives of the PhD viva include:

Verifying authorship: confirming that the candidate completed the work independently
Testing knowledge: assessing the candidate’s understanding of their research area
Evaluating methodology: examining the logic and suitability of research methods
Assessing originality: determining the contribution the thesis makes to the field
Clarifying arguments: allowing the candidate to explain or expand on complex points

The doctoral viva also offers the candidate an opportunity to engage critically with expert feedback and demonstrate their ability to defend their findings in an academic setting.

Format

The format of a PhD viva, also called a PhD defense, thesis defense presentation or viva voce, typically includes three stages: preparation before the viva, the examination on the day, and the outcome process afterward. While procedures vary slightly by institution, the general structure remains consistent.

Before the PhD viva

The candidate submits the final thesis for examination.
The university appoints internal and external examiners.
The examiners read the thesis and prepare questions in advance.
The candidate reviews their thesis, revises key arguments and prepares answers to possible questions.

On the day of the PhD viva

The viva takes place in a formal setting, usually lasting 1–3 hours.
The candidate may begin with a brief summary or presentation (this depends on institutional policy).
The examiners ask questions covering the thesis content, methodology, theoretical framework and contribution to knowledge.
The candidate responds to each question and defends their work clearly and confidently.
In most cases, the viva is private, but some institutions allow a public defense.

After the PhD viva

The candidate leaves the room while the examiners deliberate.
The panel may award the degree, request minor or major revisions or, in rare cases, recommend failure.
The university provides a written report outlining the decision and any required changes.
If revisions are needed, the candidate must submit the amended thesis within the given timeframe.
Once approved, the candidate receives formal confirmation of the doctoral degree.

Each university provides detailed guidelines for the thesis defense process, so candidates should review local requirements carefully.

Is PhD viva open to public?

Whether a PhD viva is open to the public depends on the country and institution.

In the UK, Ireland and many Commonwealth countries, the PhD viva or viva voce is usually private. Only the candidate, examiners and possibly an independent chair attend.
In the United States and parts of Europe, the PhD defense or thesis defense presentation is often public. The candidate presents their research before an audience, followed by a private examination.
In countries like Sweden and Finland, the doctoral defense (disputation) is traditionally public and may include an invited opponent who critiques the thesis in an open academic debate.

Even when the viva is closed to the public, institutions may allow observers such as supervisors, depending on local policy. Candidates should always confirm the format with their university.

Attendees

The attendees at a PhD viva, also called a viva voce, doctoral viva, or PhD defense, depend on institutional rules and whether the examination is private or public.

In a private viva (common in the UK and Commonwealth countries), the typical attendees include:

The PhD candidate: the person defending the thesis
The internal examiner: a faculty member from the candidate’s institution
The external examiner: an expert from another university
The independent chair (optional): oversees the process to ensure fairness
The supervisor (sometimes): may attend as a silent observer, if permitted

In a public defense (common in the US and some European countries), additional attendees may include:

Audience members: faculty, students or guests
An opponent (in Nordic countries): formally critiques the thesis in a structured debate.

Outcomes

The possible outcomes of a PhD viva — also known as a doctoral viva, viva voce, thesis defense presentation or PhD defense — vary slightly by institution, but they generally fall into clear categories. After the oral examination, the examiners decide whether the candidate has met the criteria for a doctoral degree.

Here are the most common outcomes:

Pass with no corrections: The candidate is awarded the PhD without needing any changes. This is rare but possible.
Pass with minor corrections: The thesis requires small revisions such as clarifying arguments, correcting typos or tightening citations. These changes are usually submitted within 1–3 months and do not require re-examination.
Pass with major corrections: The thesis needs significant revisions to structure, methodology or argumentation. The candidate must resubmit the thesis within a set period, usually 3–12 months. In some cases, examiners may review the revised thesis without a second viva.
Revise and resubmit: The thesis does not meet the required standard but shows potential. The candidate must rewrite and resubmit the thesis, often facing a second viva. This outcome is more serious than major corrections.
Award of a lower degree: If the thesis does not qualify for a PhD but meets the standard for a master’s degree (e.g. MPhil), the panel may recommend awarding the lower degree.
Fail with no award: This is rare. The candidate fails and receives no degree. This outcome usually follows a poorly prepared thesis and weak viva performance.

Appeal

You can appeal the outcome of a PhD viva — also known as a viva voce, doctoral viva or PhD defense — but only under specific conditions. Universities allow appeals based on procedural irregularities, not academic judgement.

You may appeal if:

The examination process did not follow university regulations
There was examiner bias or conflict of interest
You were not given fair opportunity to present your case
There was a material error in the outcome decision

You cannot appeal simply because you disagree with the examiners’ academic judgement or feedback.

To begin the appeal:

Review your university’s formal appeals policy
Submit a written appeal within the specified deadline (usually 10–30 days)
Include supporting evidence (e.g. emails, medical certificates, proof of procedural error)
Await the outcome of the appeal review, which may involve a panel or investigation.

Preparing for PhD viva

To prepare effectively for a PhD viva — also known as a viva voce, doctoral viva, thesis defense presentation or PhD defense — you need to focus on three key areas: the content of your thesis, the viva format, and your presentation skills. Below is a structured guide, including expert-recommended resources and an important note on preparing your thesis for submission.

1. Prepare your thesis for submission

Before facing the viva, ensure your thesis is clear, coherent and professionally presented. This improves your chances of a smooth examination.

Revise for clarity: Ensure your arguments are logically structured and well supported.
Check formatting: Follow university submission guidelines for layout, citations and references.
Hire a professional proofreader: A qualified academic proofreader can improve the overall quality of your thesis by:
- Correcting grammar, spelling and punctuation errors
- Improving sentence clarity and fixing awkward phrasing
- Ensuring consistent use of terminology, abbreviations and referencing style
- Standardising headings, spacing, numbering and layout
- Checking captions and labels for tables and figures
- Flagging inconsistencies in style, tone or formatting across chapters
- Ensuring the thesis meets institutional and style guide requirements (e.g. APA, Chicago, MLA)

2. Understand the format

Familiarise yourself with your institution’s viva regulations
Confirm whether a presentation is required
Learn about your examiners’ work and research interests

3. Know your thesis thoroughly

Reread your thesis with a critical eye
Highlight your core arguments, methods and findings
Identify potential weaknesses and prepare responses

4. Practise answering questions

Set up a mock viva with your supervisor or peers
Practise answering common questions (e.g. ‘What’s your original contribution?’)
Summarise your thesis in under three minutes for warm-up questions

5. Revise key literature

Refresh your understanding of major works and debates in your field
Be prepared to explain how your research fits into or challenges existing knowledge

6. Manage your mindset

Rest well the night before
Approach the viva as a scholarly discussion
Practise calm, clear communication

Resources

How to Survive Your Viva by Rowena Murray provides detailed guidance on common viva questions, examiner expectations and how to manage nerves effectively.
The PhD Viva by Peter Smith explains the structure and aims of the viva, including examiner roles, with real-life examples from UK universities.
PhD Life Raft Podcast hosted by Dr Emma Brodzinski features supportive, conversational episodes on how to prepare mentally and practically for the viva and life after the PhD.
PhD: Addicted to Research podcast shares real experiences from doctoral researchers, including insights into what to expect during and after the viva.
Vitae: The viva offers a clear and structured guide to viva expectations, preparation checklists and examiner insights, tailored to UK institutions.
The Thesis Whisperer: The dreaded doctoral defense provides in-depth articles and tips on viva preparation, common pitfalls and how to handle difficult examiner questions.

Fun facts

Shortest PhD viva: While there’s no official record of the shortest PhD viva, mathematician John H. Conway co-authored what is considered the shortest published mathematical paper, containing only two words and two diagrams. This anecdote is often associated with his PhD viva, which is said to have lasted only a few minutes.

Ceremonial traditions: In Finland, doctoral graduates receive a traditional PhD sword and hat during a conferment ceremony, symbolising the freedom of research and the pursuit of truth. These items are significant cultural symbols in Finnish academia.

Finnish PhD graduates receive hats and swords after their PhD viva — Finnish doctoral graduates with PhD hats and swords (Source: www.discoverphds.com)

Public defenses: Swedish universities maintain the tradition of public PhD defenses, where the candidate defends their thesis in a formal setting, often involving an appointed opponent who critiques the work in detail. This practice emphasises academic transparency and discourse.

Conclusion

The PhD viva is a significant academic milestone that tests the candidate’s expertise, reasoning and communication skills. By preparing thoroughly — including proofreading the thesis, reviewing key literature and practising questions — candidates can approach the viva with confidence. Understanding the process and knowing what to expect can turn this final step into a valuable and rewarding academic experience.

Contact me if you are an academic author looking for editing or indexing services. I am an experienced editor offering a free sample edit and an early bird discount.